As at 30 September 2026, the median public B2B SaaS company in the SaaS Capital Index traded at 4.2 times annualized run-rate revenue, down from 7.0x at the end of 2024 and a 16.9x peak in August 2021. Multiples vary hugely with growth: companies growing under 10% had a median of 2.3x, while those growing 20–30% had 5.5x. Private companies usually trade lower.
Key takeaways
- SaaS Capital Index median: 4.2x run-rate revenue (30 Sep 2026), after a low of 3.1x in June 2026.
- By growth: 2.3x under 10%, 4.4x at 10–20%, 5.5x at 20–30%, and much higher for the few growing 30% or more.
- Private SaaS companies have historically been predicted at about 70–75% of the public multiple.
- AI-native companies have raised at 20x to 30x revenue or more, but those are venture rounds, not sale prices.
- Always check what a multiple is measured against: run-rate, trailing, forward revenue or ARR.
When I wrote The Subscription Playbook, Snowflake was the poster child for usage-based software.
It had net dollar retention of 158%. Revenue was growing 121% a year. It reached a valuation of $92 billion with its IPO.
Four years after the book came out, almost everything about the software market has changed. Multiples have collapsed. AI has investors questioning whether software companies will survive at all.
And Snowflake? In the September 2026 SaaS Capital Index data, it was still one of the five most highly valued companies in the index, at 19x run-rate revenue.
That tells you most of what you need to know about SaaS multiples in 2026. The average has fallen a long way. But the market still pays very well for growth and retention. It's just paying for less of everyone else.
Here's the data.
What are SaaS multiples today?
The SaaS Capital Index tracks US-listed B2B SaaS companies and measures their value against annualized current run-rate revenue. It excludes consumer SaaS, companies with very low revenue per customer, and companies with large non-SaaS revenue streams. That makes it one of the cleaner benchmarks for a private B2B software business.
I downloaded the monthly data for this guide. Here's 2026 so far.
| Month (end) | Median multiple |
|---|---|
| January 2026 | 4.8x |
| February 2026 | 3.6x |
| March 2026 | 3.7x |
| April 2026 | 3.6x |
| May 2026 | 3.4x |
| June 2026 | 3.1x |
| July 2026 | 3.9x |
| August 2026 | 4.6x |
| September 2026 | 4.2x |
June's 3.1x was the lowest reading since September 2011.
SaaS Capital's April 2026 commentary put it bluntly: valuations "hit decade-plus lows in Q1 2026 as markets priced in AI as an existential threat." Growing concern about AI "catalyzed a sharp re-rating lower."
How have SaaS multiples changed since 2021?
| Date | Median multiple |
|---|---|
| August 2021 (all-time peak in the data) | 16.9x |
| December 2021 | 13.7x |
| December 2022 | 6.5x |
| December 2023 | 7.0x |
| December 2024 | 7.0x |
| December 2025 | 5.6x |
| September 2026 | 4.2x |
Three distinct periods stand out:
- 2021: the peak. Low interest rates and lockdown-era growth pushed multiples to historic highs. That's when Salesforce paid about 26 times Slack's projected revenue.
- 2022 to 2025: the plateau. Multiples reset to the 6x to 7x range and mostly stayed there until late 2025.
- 2026: the AI shock. Investors marked down software on fears that AI would replace it, or cut the seats it's sold by.
If someone quotes you a multiple, ask which of those three worlds it came from.
How do multiples change with growth?
Using the September 2026 index data, I grouped the 58 companies that had both a valuation multiple and a revenue growth rate.
| Revenue growth | Companies | Median multiple |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10% | 18 | 2.3x |
| 10–20% | 24 | 4.4x |
| 20–30% | 11 | 5.5x |
| 30% or more | 5 | 19.0x |
The median growth rate across those companies was about 13%, which matches SaaS Capital's observation that index growth has fallen from above 30% in 2021 to the low teens.
The top band is just five companies, so don't treat 19x as a benchmark. But the shape is the point. Going from single-digit growth to 20% growth roughly doubles the multiple.
Do profitable SaaS companies get higher multiples?
It's more nuanced than you might expect. Here's the same data grouped by Rule of 40 score (growth rate plus profit margin).
| Rule of 40 score | Companies | Median multiple |
|---|---|---|
| Under 20 | 28 | 2.8x |
| 20 to 40 | 24 | 5.6x |
| 40 or more | 6 | 5.1x |
Companies scoring under 20 are clearly penalized. Above 20, the sample of companies scoring 40-plus is too small to say they're valued higher. In this dataset, growth explains more of the multiple than profit does.
For a private business, I'd read that as: profitability protects you from the bottom of the range, while growth and retention move you to the top.
What's the spread between the best and worst?
Enormous.
| Highest multiples, Sep 2026 | Multiple | Lowest multiples, Sep 2026 | Multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrowdStrike | 45.8x | Upland Software | 0.1x |
| Palo Alto Networks | 23.7x | Definitive Healthcare | 0.4x |
| Datadog | 21.7x | Domo | 0.5x |
| Snowflake | 19.0x | ||
| JFrog | 17.9x |
The top of the list is mostly security and data infrastructure: software that customers can't do without, and whose usage grows naturally. The bottom is companies with slow growth, falling revenue or heavy debt.
A median tells you where the middle is. Your business could sit anywhere on that spread.
What multiples do private SaaS companies get?
Private companies usually trade below public ones. They're smaller, riskier and you can't sell their shares on an exchange tomorrow.
The best recent public estimate comes from SaaS Capital's 2025 model. When the public index stood at 7.0x, it predicted 4.8x for bootstrapped private SaaS companies and 5.3x for equity-backed ones. That's about 70–75% of the public multiple.
If you apply a similar ratio to the September 2026 public median of 4.2x, you get something around 3x run-rate revenue for a typical private B2B SaaS company. That's my extrapolation, not a published figure. A private company with strong growth and retention can beat it comfortably. A small, founder-run one will often be valued on profit instead.
Estimate your own multiple
Enter your growth, retention and margin to get an indicative revenue multiple range with the free Subscription Business Valuation Estimator.
What multiples do AI companies get?
This is the strangest part of the 2026 market. While the median SaaS multiple hit decade lows, some AI-native companies raised money at multiples not seen since 2021.
| Company | Reported valuation | Reported revenue at the time | Rough multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cursor (Nov 2025) | $29.3 billion | More than $1 billion annualized revenue | about 29x |
| ElevenLabs (Feb 2026) | $11 billion | More than $330 million ARR (end 2025) | about 33x |
| Lovable (Aug 2026) | $13.3 billion | ARR tracking to about $600 million | about 22x |
Three cautions before you use these.
- They're venture rounds, not sales. Investors bought minority stakes, usually with preference rights, betting on growth that most companies never achieve.
- Growth was extraordinary. Lovable, for example, said its ARR had nearly tripled from $200 million. That's not the same business as a SaaS company growing 15%.
- Margins are different. AI products pay for compute every time a customer uses them, so AI gross margins can be well below classic SaaS. Buyers will eventually price that in.
The full stories are in the Cursor and ElevenLabs case studies, and the $100M ARR class of 2026 report covers how the fastest growers price.
Why are SaaS multiples higher than for industrial companies?
Because a dollar of SaaS revenue usually carries:
- higher gross margin, so more of it becomes profit at scale;
- more predictability, because it renews automatically;
- compounding, because new customers add to the base and existing ones can expand;
- lower capital needs, because growth doesn't require factories or inventory.
In the book I wrote that a higher gross margin means a higher price-to-revenue multiple. That's still true. It's also why AI products with lower margins may not hold their multiples once growth slows.
Which revenue is the multiple based on?
This catches people out all the time.
| Measure | What it is | Effect on the multiple |
|---|---|---|
| Run-rate revenue | Current period revenue, annualized | The SaaS Capital Index uses this |
| ARR | Contracted recurring revenue, annualized | Common in private deals; excludes one-off fees |
| Trailing twelve months (TTM) | Actual revenue over the last year | Lower base for growing companies, so higher multiple |
| Next twelve months (NTM) | Forecast revenue | Higher base, so lower multiple |
A company worth $40 million with $8 million TTM revenue and $10 million of ARR is "5x TTM" and "4x ARR" at the same time. Both are true. Only compare like with like. My guide to ARR covers how to calculate it honestly.
How do you apply a multiple to your own business?
- Calculate clean ARR: recurring only, excluding one-off fees and sales tax.
- Start with a current benchmark: the public median, adjusted down for private company risk.
- Adjust for growth: use the growth bands above as a guide.
- Adjust for retention: NRR above 100% supports a premium; high churn pulls you down.
- Adjust for margin, size and risk: concentration, founder dependence, legal exposure.
- Cross-check on profit: does the implied EBITDA multiple make sense for your likely buyer?
The full method, with a worked example, is in how to value a SaaS business. The 2026 benchmarks page shows how your growth and retention compare.
When do multiples mislead?
- When the business isn't really SaaS. Services revenue doesn't earn software multiples.
- When the data is old. A 2021 multiple applied in 2026 is a fantasy.
- When the comparison is a funding round. Minority stakes and acquisitions aren't priced the same way.
- When the multiple is on the wrong revenue. Check run-rate vs TTM vs NTM.
- When it ignores debt and cash. Enterprise value and equity value differ.
For Australian founders, there are local wrinkles too: GST, R&D refunds and the 2027 changes. See valuing an Australian SaaS business.
What to do next
Work out your growth rate, NRR and gross margin, then put them into the estimator to see roughly where your business sits on the spread.
Subscription Business Valuation EstimatorEstimate a revenue multiple range from growth, retention and margin.Open the free tool →For the bigger picture of how valuation works, start with valuing a subscription business.
Free Subscription Profit Review
Australian business owners can book a free 30-minute review with a BPAG Accountants adviser. An honest conversation about:
- whether a subscription model could work for your business
- how recurring revenue could cover your fixed costs each month
- how it could lift what your business is worth
No cost, no obligation. General information only until we understand your situation.
Frequently asked questions
What is a good revenue multiple for a SaaS company?
It depends on growth, retention, margin and size, so there's no single good number. As a 2026 reference point, the public median was about 4.2x run-rate revenue, and companies growing 20–30% traded around 5.5x. A private company growing in the mid-teens with solid retention might expect less than the public median. Anything well above that needs a story a buyer believes.
Why did SaaS multiples fall so much in 2026?
SaaS Capital attributed the sharp re-rating in the first quarter of 2026 to growing concern that AI posed an existential risk to the SaaS business model. Slower growth across the sector also played a part: the median growth rate in its index had declined from above 30% in 2021 to the low teens. Multiples recovered somewhat from the June low by September.
Are micro SaaS businesses valued on revenue?
Often not. Very small SaaS products, especially those run by one founder, are commonly valued on profit, such as seller's discretionary earnings, because the buyer is often buying an income stream and taking on the founder's work. Revenue multiples still appear in marketplace listings, but the buyer pool is price-sensitive and the multiples are usually lower than for larger companies.
Do EBITDA multiples matter for SaaS?
Yes, increasingly. Private equity buyers and acquirers of mature, profitable SaaS companies often price on EBITDA, using revenue multiples as a cross-check. Since 2022 the market has rewarded efficient growth, and SaaS Capital noted that the median public SaaS company now has an operating profit. If you're profitable, expect both measures to be used.
How often do SaaS multiples change?
Every day for public companies, because share prices move. The SaaS Capital Index publishes monthly data, and in 2026 the median moved from 4.8x in January to 3.1x in June and 4.2x in September. If you're valuing your own business, use the most recent data you can find, and expect it to look different by the time a deal closes.
General information only, current as at October 2026. It isn't legal, tax or financial advice and doesn't consider your circumstances. Speak to a qualified adviser before acting.
Talk it through with a BPAG adviser
Free for Australian business owners: a 30-minute Subscription Profit Review on whether a subscription suits your business.
Sources
- SaaS Capital Index, data as of 30 Sep 2026 (downloadable dataset)
- SaaS Capital, Four early 2026 SaaS trends (9 Apr 2026)
- SaaS Capital, 2025 Private SaaS Company Valuations (24 Jan 2025)
- CNBC, Cursor raises $2.3 billion at $29.3 billion valuation (13 Nov 2025)
- ElevenLabs, ElevenLabs raises $500M Series D at $11B valuation (4 Feb 2026)
- Tech Startups, Lovable raises $400 million at $13.3 billion valuation as ARR nears $600 million (12 Aug 2026)
- The Subscription Playbook, Robert Coorey (2022), Chapter 4 (Snowflake) and Chapter 5 (gross margin)
Facts and prices checked 27 October 2026. Spotted something out of date? Tell us.
