1. Home
  2. Subscription Business in Australia
  3. ACCC Subscription Traps
Chapter 9 of The Subscription Playbook

What the ACCC Expects From Subscription Businesses (and How to Pass Its Test)

The ACCC has named subscription traps as an enforcement priority, and it isn't waiting for the 2027 law to act. Here's what its recent cases reveal, and how to audit your own flows the way a regulator would.

By Robert Coorey Updated 8 min read
The short answer

The ACCC expects subscription businesses to make it clear when someone is signing up to a subscription, show the full price and renewal terms, honor cancellations, and tell customers about every option when prices change. It has named subscription traps and dark patterns as 2026–27 priorities, and is already suing under existing consumer law, ahead of new rules from 1 July 2027.

Key takeaways

  • Subscription traps and dark patterns are on the ACCC's 2026–27 compliance and enforcement priority list.
  • The ACCC is using today's Australian Consumer Law: misleading conduct and unfair contract terms.
  • HelloFresh (cancellation cut-offs), Microsoft (a hidden cheaper plan) and Amazon (mid-contract changes) each show a different mistake.
  • From 1 July 2027 the ACCC gets new subscription-specific rules and a general ban on unfair trading practices.
  • The best defense is a flow you'd be comfortable showing a judge, screenshot by screenshot.

Picture a new HelloFresh customer.

She signs up for a meal kit. The website says she can cancel online before a cut-off. She changes her mind, goes into her account, and cancels well before the deadline.

The box arrives anyway. So does the charge.

According to the ACCC, that happened to 62,061 HelloFresh customers between January 2023 and March 2025, and to 39,408 Youfoodz customers between October 2022 and November 2024. In December 2025 the regulator took both companies to the Federal Court.

That case tells you a lot about how the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) thinks about subscriptions. It didn't wait for the new subscription law that starts on 1 July 2027. It used the law that already exists.

This guide covers what the ACCC expects as at October 2026: its priorities, its recent subscription cases, and a self-audit you can run this week. It's general information, not legal advice.

Is the ACCC targeting subscription businesses?

Yes, explicitly.

In February 2026 the ACCC announced its compliance and enforcement priorities for 2026–27. One of them is manipulative and false practices in digital markets. ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb named "subscription traps and other dark patterns that manipulate consumer behaviour" as a focus.

The ACCC also said it would expand its education and compliance work to support the government's unfair trading practices reforms. In plain terms: it's warming up for 1 July 2027.

What laws does the ACCC use against subscription traps today?

Before July 2027, the ACCC mostly relies on two parts of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

Misleading or deceptive conduct, and false or misleading representations. If your sign-up page, emails or cancellation screens give people a wrong impression about price, commitment or their options, that can be a breach. Most subscription cases so far fall here.

Unfair contract terms. Since 9 November 2023, proposing or relying on an unfair term in a standard form consumer or small business contract can attract penalties. Terms that let you change the deal mid-contract, renew automatically on your terms only, or penalize customers for leaving are the classic suspects.

From 1 July 2027 it gets three more tools: specific subscription duties (disclosure, notices, an easy exit), a drip pricing rule, and a general ban on unfair trading practices. My guide to Australia's subscription trap laws covers those in detail.

What do the ACCC's subscription cases have in common?

Three recent cases, three different mistakes. All were allegations before the courts when I checked in October 2026, so read them as warnings, not findings.

Case What the ACCC alleges The mistake The fix
HelloFresh and Youfoodz (Dec 2025) Customers who canceled online before the advertised cut-off were still charged and sent their first order. HelloFresh allegedly required payment details just to see the full menu, and clicking through to choose meals enrolled people in an ongoing subscription The cancel button didn't do what it said, and the sign-up wasn't clearly a sign-up Let people browse first. Make sure canceling before a cut-off actually stops the charge, and confirm it
Microsoft 365 (Oct 2025) About 2.7 million subscribers were told to accept Copilot and a higher price or cancel. A cheaper "Classic" plan without Copilot was allegedly only visible partway through canceling. Personal went from A$109 to A$159 a year Hiding the cheaper option from people on auto-renewal Tell every customer every option before the new price applies
Amazon Prime Video (Jun 2026) Amazon allegedly relied on unfair terms to add ads to Prime Video in July 2024, then charged A$2.99 a month to remove them, including for annual members who had paid A$79 upfront Using a contract clause to make the deal worse mid-term Don't reduce what customers paid for during their term without giving them a fair way out

The common thread is simple. In each case, the ACCC says the business took advantage of the gap between what customers thought they'd agreed to and what actually happened.

You can read the ACCC's own releases on Microsoft and Amazon. The full stories are in the Microsoft 365 Copilot case study and the HelloFresh case study.

Why Microsoft's case matters for small businesses

Bundling new features into a plan and raising the price is a legitimate strategy. Canva, Slack and Xero have all done it. What turned Microsoft's price rise into a court case, according to the ACCC, was what it didn't say. The Chair said many customers "would have opted for the Classic plan" if they'd known about it. If you have a cheaper plan, a legacy plan or a downgrade path, the safe move is to mention it in the price-rise email.

What patterns does the ACCC call dark patterns?

The clearest signal of what regulators will look for is the new section 28B of the ACL, which starts on 1 July 2027. It lists examples of conduct that may be an unfair trading practice:

  • impeding a consumer's ability to exercise legal rights or seek legal remedies;
  • failing to disclose material information;
  • disclosing it in a "complex, ineffective, unclear, unintelligible, ambiguous, untimely or overwhelming way";
  • using design elements in digital interfaces that put people under unreasonable pressure, or obstruct them from making or carrying out their decision.

Translated into subscription design, the patterns I'd remove now are:

  1. Card details to browse. Asking for payment before people can see what they're buying.
  2. Pre-ticked boxes. Auto-adding a subscription, add-on or upgrade.
  3. Buried renewal terms. The auto-renewal sits behind a link instead of next to the button.
  4. Fake urgency. Countdown timers or "only 2 spots left" that aren't true.
  5. The cancellation maze. Multiple pages, repeated offers, hidden buttons, or "call us to cancel" when people joined online.
  6. Confirm-shaming. Buttons like "No, I don't want to save money."
  7. Silent price rises. Increasing the price at renewal without a clear notice.

None of these are new as bad practice. They were always a short-term win and a long-term loss. What's changed is that, from July 2027, they can also be a breach of the law.

Want a second pair of eyes on your subscription?

A BPAG adviser can review your subscription pricing, renewal and refund setup and GST, and tell you where to bring in a lawyer before the ACCC's 2027 rules start.

Book a free profit review

How do you audit your subscription like the ACCC would?

The ACCC builds cases from evidence: screenshots, emails, scripts, complaint volumes and billing records. So audit yourself the same way.

Step 1: Capture the customer journey

Sign up as a new customer on desktop and on mobile. Screenshot every screen. Save every email. Then do the same for a renewal and a price change, if you can trigger test versions.

Step 2: Try to cancel

Cancel using only what a customer can see. Count the clicks and screens. Time it. If you sell by phone, call your own line and ask to cancel.

Step 3: Read it like a tired customer

Would a busy person, on a phone, at night, understand:

  • that this is a subscription;
  • the full price, including GST and fees;
  • when they'll be charged and when it renews;
  • how to cancel, and what happens if they do?

Step 4: Check your complaints and chargebacks

Look at complaints that mention "didn't know," "couldn't cancel," "still charged" or "never signed up." Look at chargeback reasons. The HelloFresh investigation was reportedly prompted by a large number of consumer complaints. Your complaint log is your early warning system.

Step 5: Check your terms

Look for clauses that let you change prices, features or terms one-sidedly with no exit, or that make customers pay to leave. My guide to unfair contract terms in subscription agreements explains how to test them.

You can run a quick version of this audit with the free checker.

AU Subscription Compliance CheckerCheck your sign-up and cancellation flow against the new Australian rules.Open the free tool →

When should a business contact the ACCC?

As a business, you might deal with the ACCC in a few situations:

  • You want to report a competitor. If a rival is trapping customers and taking business from honest operators, you can report it to the ACCC.
  • You've found a problem in your own business. Fixing it, refunding affected customers and getting legal advice comes first. Your lawyer can advise whether and how to approach the regulator.
  • The ACCC contacts you. Respond promptly, through a lawyer, and preserve records.

The ACCC says it doesn't investigate individual complaints or give legal advice. For a dispute with one customer, the state fair trading agency is usually the right place. For the full picture of law, tax and cash flow together, see running a subscription business in Australia.

Is the ACCC's approach bad news for subscription businesses?

Not for good ones.

I've always believed the best retention strategy is a product people want to keep. In the book I wrote that you can only have net negative churn when you have happy customers. The ACCC's focus doesn't change that. It just removes the shortcut.

If your retention depends on friction, the honest answer is that your subscription has a product problem, not a compliance problem. Use the churn risk checklist to find out where customers would leave if leaving were easy, then fix the reasons, not the exit. My guide to cancellation rules in Australia shows how to keep the save offer and lose the trap.

What to do next

  1. Run the five-step audit above this month.
  2. Remove the seven dark patterns from your flows.
  3. Rewrite your price-rise and renewal emails to list every option.
  4. Review your terms for one-sided change clauses.
  5. Check what tighter cancellation might do to your churn, cash flow and pricing.

That last step is where the accounting side comes in. If fixing your flows lifts churn for a few months, you want to know the impact on cash before it happens.

Free Subscription Profit Review

BPAG Accountants powered by Nagaris

Australian business owners can book a free 30-minute review with a BPAG Accountants adviser. An honest conversation about:

  • whether a subscription model could work for your business
  • how recurring revenue could cover your fixed costs each month
  • how it could lift what your business is worth
Book my free review Call 1300 272 422

No cost, no obligation. General information only until we understand your situation.

Frequently asked questions

Does the ACCC handle individual subscription complaints?

Generally no. The ACCC says it doesn't investigate individual complaints or give legal advice. It uses reports to spot patterns and decide where to take action. Individual consumers are usually pointed to their state or territory consumer protection agency, such as NSW Fair Trading or Consumer Affairs Victoria, and small businesses to a small business commissioner or ombudsman.

Can the ACCC fine my business without going to court?

For some contraventions, yes. The ACCC can issue infringement notices, which are fixed penalties paid without a court hearing, and it has issued them for drip pricing in the past. From 1 July 2027, infringement notices will also be available for the new general ban on unfair trading practices. Larger penalties, injunctions and compensation orders need a court.

Does the ACCC care about B2B subscriptions?

Yes, mostly through unfair contract terms. Since November 2023, small business standard form contracts can attract penalties if they contain unfair terms, and a small business means fewer than 100 employees or turnover under A$10 million. From July 2027, the new subscription notice and cancellation duties also protect small business subscribers on standard form contracts.

What should I do if the ACCC contacts my business?

Take it seriously and get legal advice straight away. Don't delete records or quietly change your flows without keeping copies of what customers saw before. Many ACCC matters start with a request for information or a compliance letter rather than a lawsuit, and businesses that fix problems and refund customers quickly are in a much better position.

Can I offer a discount to stop someone canceling?

Usually yes, as long as the offer doesn't obstruct the cancellation. A single, clear save offer with an equally clear 'no thanks, cancel' option is common good practice. Repeated pop-ups, guilt-trip wording or making customers call to finish canceling are the patterns regulators describe as dark patterns, and from 2027 they risk breaching the unfair trading practices ban.

General information only, current as at October 2026. It isn't legal, tax or financial advice and doesn't consider your circumstances. Speak to a qualified adviser before acting.

Talk it through with a BPAG adviser

Free for Australian business owners: a 30-minute Subscription Profit Review on whether a subscription suits your business.

The review is with a BPAG Accountants adviser by phone or video. No cost, no obligation. Your details go to Subscription Playbook and BPAG Accountants Pty Ltd. Privacy.

Robert Coorey

Robert Coorey, MBA

Robert is the author of The Subscription Playbook and Feed a Starving Crowd and a Director at BPAG Accountants in Sydney. More about Robert.

Free toolsFree book